NCLB Creates Situations Where We Look Stupid And Unprepared
I am happy that I'll be teaching summer school. I've been sort of type-cast a good math teacher, the kind that can handle remedial students. There are days when I'm amazed by how much I like these kids because when I was a RadioShack Manager stupid and lazy recent high school grads annoyed me. You could even say that I disliked them. Anyway, here is an article about my summer school assignment. Apparently, the State of Georgia knew that students wouldn't do very well on the tests but they did not tell anyone. Now people are pissed about it.
In my opinion one of the problems with standardized testing is that teachers prepare students (at least they're suppose to be doing that) based on broad standards for a specific test. Teachers are not allowed to look at the tests and if they do they are threatened with loss of license. I agree with maintaining the integrity of tests but there are those that believe in order to teach effectively teaching should be designed based on the information you want students to know. Here is a current 8th grade math standard.
M8A4. Students will graph and analyze graphs of linear equations and inequalitities.On a small scale, I design my assessments ( for a course or units) which includes questions about what I want to students to know. Then I create units and lessons based upon the assessments, which provides me with a specific road map for where to take the students.a. Interpret slope as a rate of change.
b. Determine the meaning of the slope and y-intercept in a given situation.
c. Graph equations of the form y = mx + b.
d. Graph equations of the form ax + by = c.
e. Graph the solution set of a linear inequality, identifying whether the solution set is an open or a closed half-plane.
f. Determine the equation of a line given a graph, numerical information that defines the line or a context involving a linear relationship.
g. Solve problems involving linear relationships.
But the standards are, in general, vague. They don't provide information about many details of the topic or the type of problems that students will need to understand. The standard is flexible. It allows teachers teach the topic to students who may have many different learning styles, understandings and backgrounds. The trouble is that we really have no idea what the students should expect on the test. Education's goal is to help students learn, understand and succeed in school but students and teachers are measured by a double secret test.
Maybe I am exaggerating but in the "real world" would you expect to conclude a successful project with out knowing and completely understanding the end result that you desire? No, it would be nuts.
There is more news. The State of Georgia knows the number who students failed the state tests over the last few years but has not studied what happened to them. I have another question, "How much does NCLB mean if we don't use the information we collect to help future students?"
The answer is clear. The government, Federal and state, doesn't care what happens to these kids. If they did they would be able to tell me what happened to those students:
How did they do in Algebra when they were freshman in high school?
Do they have similar socio-economic issues?
Are they native English speaker?
Do they have disabilities?
Perhaps knowledge of their issues could help the government and schools serve children better.












